Requirements
1. Required
condition of article acceptance for publication is the availability of
innovative research results that had previously never been published. If the
materials of the article have been published previously, the author must
provide the Editorial Board with bibliographic references of previous
publication, justifying the relevance of publishing a new version, and
explaining the nature of additions and changes to the last version of the
article.
2. The article
should be submitted along with a review by a reputable scientist in the relevant field of science (Ph.D.,
professor) or a recommendation for printing by the corresponding department.
3. Scientific
article should contain the following essential elements: problem definition and
its relationship with important scientific and practical tasks, analysis of
recent research and publications, which discuss this issue and on which the
author relies in his research; unresolved aspects of the problem which is the
subject matter of the article; formulation of the article purposes; presentation
of the basic material with full justification of scientific results; the
findings of this study and recommendations for further research in this
direction. All these elements should be presented in the text, but they need
not be graphically pointed.
4. Manuscripts
(articles, reviews etc) are submitted a e-copy (by e-mail) (Times New Roman 14, interval 1.5, indention is 1.25 centimeters ,
all margins are 2 centimeters )
in the format of Microsoft Word, OpenOffice, RTF or WordPerfect without
hyphenation of words.
5. At the top of the first page the headline of
the article is printed; information about the author is given single-space below. Single-space
more abstract and keywords are given. Keywords must include the name of the author whose texts are
researched. It's advisable to add abstracts in the languages of the readership the author
is interested.
6. The dash (–) and the hyphen
(-) are different in size and spaces before and after the dash. Initials in the
name (e.g., V. A. Lavrenov), abridgements such as the 20th century,
names of towns are printed through non-breaking space (simultaneous pressing
Ctrl + Shift + Spacebar). If necessary use unbreakable dash (simultaneous
pressing Ctrl + Shift + hyphen).
7. All references
in the text of the article are given in square brackets (number in the
reference list, volume and pages) [3, v. 1, p. 12–13]. The number of the page and its abbreviation are printed
through non-breaking space. Between the numbers of pages put dashes. The
quotations and references must be verified relative to primary sources.
References at the bottom of the page are not permitted.
8. At the end of
the article the list of references is attached in alphabetical order (see examples of bibliographic description).
9. Materials of the authors who do not meet the
requirements won’t be considered.
About the Authors
First name, last name.
ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID. http://orcid.org/).
E-mail of the author.
Academic degree, academic status, position.
Full name of the educational
establishment (in the nominative case) as a place of employment / studying
(faculty, department, university, etc.).
Institution Address (street, house number,
postal code, city, country).
Abstract
An abstract is a succinct summary of
a longer piece of work, usually academic in nature, which is published in
isolation from the main text and should therefore stand on its own and be
understandable without reference to the longer piece. Its purpose is to act as
a reference tool, enabling the reader to decide whether or not to read the full
text.
There are four fields which are
obligatory in abstracts: Purpose, Design/methodology/approach, Findings and Originality/value;
the other three (Research limitations/implications, Practical implications, and
Social implications) may be omitted if they are not applicable to your paper.
Basic Requirements for Abstracts. Follow the chronology of the paper and use
its headings as guidelines. Write concisely and clearly: do not include
unnecessary details. You are writing for an audience "in the know" –
you can use the technical language of your discipline or profession, providing
you communicate your meaning clearly, and bear in mind that you are writing to
an international audience. Make sure that what you write "flows"
properly, that there are "connecting words" (e.g. consequently,
moreover, for example, the benefits of this study, as a result, etc.) and/or
the points you make are not disjointed but follow on from one another. Use the
active rather than the passive voice, e.g. "The study tested" rather
than "It was tested in this study".
Abstracts should contain 200-250
words.
Using keywords
Using keywords is a vital part of
abstract writing. Keywords act as the search term. Use keywords that are
specific, and that reflect what is essential about the paper.
Examples of bibliographic description
Book:
Culler J. Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction /
Jonathan Culler. – Oxford : Oxford Univ.
Press, 1997. – 145 p.
Blickle P.
Das Alte Europa. Vom Hochmittelalter bis zur Moderne / Peter Blickle. – München
: C.H. Beck, 2008. – 320 S.
Sollers Ph.
Céline / Philippe Sollers. – Paris : Ecriture, 2009. – 107 p.
Mitosek Z. Teorie badań literackich / Zofia Mitosek. – Warszawa : Wydawn. Naukowe PWN, 1995. – 477 s.
Book (several authors):
Gallagher C. Practicing New Historicism /
Catherine Gallagher, Stephen Greenblatt. – Chicago
; London : Univ. of Chicago
Press, 2000. – 249 p.
Kliems A.
Spätmoderne. Lyrik des 20. Jahrhunderts in Ost-Mittel-Europa I. /
A. Kliems, U. Raßloff, P. Zajac. – Berlin : Frank & Timme,
2006. – 444 S.
Catteau J. Dostoïevski / Jacques
Catteau, Jacques Rolland. – Lagrasse : Verdier, 1983. –
252 р.
Bazarnik K.
(O)patrzenie / K. Bazarnik, Z. Fajfer. – Wyd. II. – Kraków :
Korporacja „Ha!art”, 2009. – 63 s.
Part of the book :
Culler J.
Prolegomena to a Theory of Reading / Jonathan Culler // The Reader in the Text
: Essays on Audience and Interpretation ; [edited by Susan R. Suleiman and Inge
Crosman [Wimmers]. – Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 1980. – P.
46–67.
Kulcsár-Szabó E.
Subjekt und Sprachlichkeit. Das „spätmoderne” Paradigma und Umrisse einer
integrativen Geschichte der literarischen Moderne / E. Kulcsár-Szabó,
M. Szegedy-Maszák // Epoche – Text – Medialität: Diskurs der Moderne in
der ungarischen Literaturwissenschaft. – Tübingen : Niemeyer, 1999. – S. 51–74.
Burzyńska A. Kariera narracji. O zwrocie
narratywistycznym w humanistyce / Anna
Burzyńska // Narracja i tożsamość. Tom I: Narracje w kulturze ; [pod red. Włodzimierza
Boleckiego i Ryszarda Nycza]. – Warszawa : Wydawn. IBL PAN, 2004. – Str. 7–43.
Article in Periodical:
Hassan I. Prometheus as Performer: Towards a
Posthumanist Culture?/ Ihab Hassan // The Georgia Review. – 1997. – Vol. 4. – No. 31. – P. 830–850.
Hay L.
Die dritte Dimension der Literatur. Notizen zu einer „critique génétique” / Louis
Hay // Poetica. Zeitschrift für Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. – 16. Band,
Jahrgang 1984. – Amsterdam : Verlag B. R. Grüner, 1984. – S. 307–323.
Kristeva J. Bakhtine, le mot, le dialogue et le
roman / Julia Kristeva // Critique. – 1967. – T. 23. – № 239. – Р. 438–465.
Nycz R. Antropologia literatury – kulturowa
teoria literatury-poetyka doświadczenia / Ryszard
Nycz // Teksty Drugie. – 2007. – Nr 6. – Str. 34–49.
Electronic
resource:
Holland Norman N. Reader-response
already is cognitive criticism
[Electronic resource] / Norman N. Holland
// Stanford
Humanities Review. – 1995, Vol. 4.
– Issue 1: Bridging
the Gap. – Available at : http://www.stanford.edu/group/SHR/4-1/text/holland.commentary.html (accessed 7 July 2012).
Stollberg-Rilinger B.
Rezension zu: Peter Blickle: Das Alte Europa. Vom Hochmittelalter bis zur
Moderne. München 2008 [Internetquelle] / B. Stollberg-Rilinger //
H-Soz-u-Kult, 16.09.2008. – Im Internet abrufbar unter : http://hsozkult.geschichte.hu-berlin.de/rezensionen/2008-3-165
(Zugriff am 12.07.2013)
Yocaris I. Relativisme cognitif
et indétermination sémiotique : abduction et méta-abduction dans l’œuvre
romanesque d’Umberto Eco [En
ligne] / Ilias Yocaris // Cahiers de Narratologie. –
2011. – № 20. – Disponible à : http://narratologie.revues.org/6385 (consulté le 08 juillet 2013).
Address of the Editorial Board
Kotsiubynsky str., 2, Chernivtsi , Ukraine ,
58012,
Department of
Foreign Literature and Theory of Literature
Editorial Board of “Problems of Literary Criticism”
tel.: 380
(372) 58-48-87
Немає коментарів:
Дописати коментар